Londonistan revisited...

I didn't think it would be this soon!

But here comes Tony Blair, succumbing to world opinion. From the Times Online:

"The first cracks in the united front over Iraq between Tony Blair and President Bush appeared last night as the Prime Minister offered Iran and Syria the prospect of dialogue over the future of Iraq and the Middle East.

"Mr Blair said there could be a new 'partnership' with Iran if it stopped supporting terrorism in Iraq and gave up its nuclear ambitions. Syria and Iran could choose partnership or isolation, he said.

"The Prime Minister tried to exploit moves in Washington to rethink strategy on Iraq by holding out the prospect of engagement with two countries once dubbed by President Bush as part of the 'axis of evil'. For the first time he also explicitly ruled out military action against Iran.

"And, in words clearly directed at Mr Bush as he prepares for his final two years in power, Mr Blair called for the United States to lead a new drive towards peace in the Middle East, including peace in Palestine and the Lebanon, arguing that ultimately it was the only way to defeat al-Qaeda."

Iran, stop supporting terrorism? Hmmm...

Michelle Malkin on Iran providing long-range missiles to Hezbollah.

Here's President Ahmadenijad's solution to the Middle East Crisis, back in August.

And, Mr. Blair, how long has Iran been supporting terrorist acts?...

...oh, at least 23 years now...

When do you think Iran will stop its nuclear ambitions? I think never. From this Yahoo piece:

"The U.S. and some of its allies allege that Iran is developing nuclear weapons and are suspicious of its intentions after Tehran concealed parts of its nuclear development from U.N. inspectors for many years.

Iran claims its program is peaceful and for generating electricity."

Who believes this claim? Not me.

Let's connect the dots people. "If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it must be a duck."...